Numerele anterioare

2, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71,

Lunile anterioare




Băsescu-PD-L - divorce in primetime

Cristian BANU

After pushing them around and from left to right, after bringing them in power and taking them off power, Traian Băsescu officially abandoned his party, in the address given in Parliament, in a move to rescue what is left to rescue and secure himself a second term in office, from any party willing to renounce its own oligarchs and start working with the “good oligarchs” approved by Cotroceni.

A shock to everybody

The first sign that something was rotten was not the sta­te­ment after the Liberal Demo­crats’ pact with Greater Romania Party. The most evident indication was Elena Udrea’s unthinkable fuss. Cooking, clea­ning, knitting on TV – utterly uni­maginable for someone who should have had no problem securing a seat in Parliament.
The separation of the two sides caught everybody on the wrong foot. The Liberals (PNL) and Social De­mocrats (PSD) tried to rehash the old slogans, but they too have realised that it won’t work, and that they must revise their tactics as soon as possible. PDL itself is at a loss, on the verge of disin­tegration, with infighting a common practice. Making Stolojan the party’s frontman for election purposes, the failure to finalise even half of the candidate lists (PD-L seems to face the largest number of withdrawal attem­pts), the clashes between ex-Liberals and ex-Democrats, are all signs of a confusion that can only be deepened by the president’s disaffection. The divorce may well be the doing of some PD members, who could never come to terms with their leaving the govern­ment two years ago.
Also, should the uninominal voting be discarded, the Democrats would be the ideal scapegoat, as the idea would have come from their “new friends,” PRM. Although not particularly keen on it either, PNL and PSD seem to have bet­ter adjusted to the new rules, and there’s peace and quiet in their corner. The media focus on the Democrats anyway these days, and the President’s speech on the public television chan­nel (TVR) only added fuel to the fire. The attack was a bad idea. When you have problems, you do your best to hide them, instead of stepping into the limelight. But both the President and the Democrats went to great lengths to maximise the scandal of the coo­pe­ration with PRM, otherwise a minor, uninteresting matter. And the recent series of motions of censure only sheds more light on how well the two parties work together.
Under these circumstances, the Democrats’ results will be much below initial expectations, and I am beginning to doubt that 25% is feasible, in case of a PNL and PSD attack that no one in PDL is able to handle. Because I think it won’t be long until the two parties realise that the divorce is “for real” and that Traian Băsescu will not interfere in the campaign.

PDL is better off

Although it may seem paradoxical, the separation benefits PDL, not only because there’s a silver lining to any cloud, but because the party will finally have a chance to define its own identity and personality, even at the cost of a lower score in the election. But Traian Băsescu will be in trouble. He is unlikely to succeed to create a civic platform to support him. And after he accepts a government, he will have to play in the hands of that coalition. And should this coalition include PDL, negotiating with a party that he had seduced and abandoned won’t be a joy ride for the President.
Both PSD and PNL are interested in containing the Democrats, and will try to take full advantage of their con­fu­sion. So far, the Democrats proved an unreliable partner in all coalitions. Inde­ed, they tried to smother all their coalition partners. But then again, the mastermind was always Traian Bă­ses­cu, and without him there is a team in PD which would manage to work well with PNL. The rise of the ex-Liberal dis­senters dramatically reduces chances of cooperation with PNL (their com­pe­tition for the right-wing electorate aside). But if talks are conducted by the old Democrats (Blaga, Videanu) and Traian Băsescu’s tyranny is abolished, the way is paved for genuine cooperation between PNL and PD.

A President for Romania

A while ago, I was saying that the forthcoming presidential election will take place in a different paradigm, because parties will have already won seats in a new Parliament and a new electoral campaign would yield very little ROI, which would change the relations between political parties and their presidential candidates.
There is no doubt that Romanians are fed up with party presidents and want a President of the country. Both Traian Băsescu and Ion Iliescu were mostly party presidents, and as such they divided Romania. Emil Constan­ti­nescu was closer to what a true President should be like, but he too paid the price of a society experiencing a violent dichotomy.
I was also saying that the next president would be someone starkly different from Traian Băsescu, in other words a “low profile” individual, pos­sibly even an independent like Mugur Isărescu or Leonard Orban, whose role would be closer to that of a consti­tu­tional monarch (although elected by the people), and far from the “involved president.”
The first who understood that is Traian Băsescu, who started his electoral campaign for a fresh term in office in Italy — yet another proof that he is a skilled politician. Traian Bă­ses­cu has understood that for him, PD (plus or minus L or D), is a failed political project, and he’d better take a distance from it as soon as possible, to rely instead on a “civic” platform and on the idea that “Traian Băsescu is the only one who can keep in check an incompetent and immoral political class,” with support from upright personalities like Monica Macovei, Cătălin Avramescu, Mircea Cărtărescu et comp.
All the president’s recent moves are intended to present a different president, a “champion of peace at the Black Sea,” a “messenger of inter-faith dialogue” (he invited the Pope to Ro­mania), who knows when to commend the Government and when to criticise it lovingly, concerned with the future of Romania for the next 100 years, backed by “genuine and respectable” intellectuals, taking a distance from a shadow-party that doesn’t even follow his instructions. This image is, of course, spiced up with promises of salary and pension increases.
In the ensuing campaign, we will no longer see the President alongside his “old friends.” The President doesn’t go through the motions of the fallout with PD; he simply doesn’t need a party any longer, for his second term in office.
At present, the President and PDL stand in each other’s way. By giving the Democrats their freedom back, the President takes them out of the isolation that he had brought upon them himself, while at the same time shunning responsibility for a predictable failure in the parliamentary election. “I left you by yourselves, and look what you incompetent people have done,” Traian Băsescu can now tell them. But on the other hand, he spares himself the humiliation of begging for the Democrats’ support in the forthcoming election campaign.

An uncertain future for Traian Băsescu

But the success of this strategy depends on too many variables. The civic platform backing the President must be strong and convincing enough if it is to mobilise the electorate and convince them that Traian Băsescu has truly changed. The President himself must consolidate his new image as “independent,” after 4 years of ordering the Democrats around. But these variables aside, the key to success in this strategy is the civic platform’s capacity to create a sense of “urgency.” Yes, we do have an incompetent and corrupt political class. Still, we have economic growth and living standards, for all social categories, are better than four years ago. We are far from the gloomy atmosphere of the PSD rule, we are an EU Member State …
We have the Saviour, but not the Apocalypse. And I doubt that in the year left until the presidential election, the civic platform will be able to make one up.

By Cristian BANU

Publicat în : English  de la numărul 60


Comentariul nr.1 - bizu a spus în 07.10.2008 13:23:00:
ma dar ce va place sa dezinformati opinia publica
Comentariul nr.2 - robert horvath usa a spus în 07.11.2008 11:22:00:


Serviciul de Informatii Externe
Domnule Razvan Ungureanu
Avand bunavointa domnului L.Pavoni consulul general dinNew York, v-am trimis o scrisoare. In ea am cerut o audienta cu dumneavoastra, sau o convorbire cu o persoana delegata. Cu aceasta oceasta ocazie am vrut sa va prezint documente confidentiale despre Vladimir Tismaneanu.Documentele clarifica materialele aparute in presa, care califica pe V.T. ca agent al securitatii. Am vrut sa prezint deasemenea acordul meu la opinia comunitatii romane americane, cu privire la necesitatea deportarii lui V.T. din Statele Unite. Dinsul a a ascuns serviciului de emigratie, faptul ca a fost membru al partidului comunist si a scris articole in care cerea rasturnarea capitalismului si a sistemului politic american prin forta. Faptul ca a mintit sub juramant, va duce la automat la deportare .Mentionez ca in dosarul lui sunt sunt si alte fapte agravante.Anexez doua materiale pertinente in acest caz,
Motivul incercarii de a va contacta este extrem de serios. Dumneavoastra sunteti printre putinele persoane competente, care puteti spune ADEVARUL presedintelui inainte de a fi prea tarziu ,pentru dansul si imaginea tarii. Presedintela Traian Basescu trebue sa aiba acces la toate documentele si faptele acestui caz.Dinsul va avea posibilitata de a se distanta de clanul care care il minte ,manipuleaza si a cere scuze Romaniei. . In caz contrariu isi va semna singur, sinuciderea politica.
De si a trecut mult timp nu am primit nici in un raspuns. Acest lucru este grav si impotriva legii, care va obliga sa raspundeti oricarei srisori oficiale. Am avut nu demult o audienta cu Simona Miculescu ambasador la ONU nu demult (Au participat deasemenea consulul adjunct A.Berechet si adjunctul misiunii T. Morar) in care am discutat despre Tismaneanu si am cerut sa fiu contactat de SIE ,la orice nivel.Din nou fara nici un rezultat. Mentionez ca ca am discutat aceasta problema cu diplomatul Ilinca Ilie Ilie de ambasada, de multe ori si cu consulul L.Pavoni chiar acum o ora.
Domnule director,
Faptul ca incercati sa blocati informatii despre un spion este de o gravitate exceptionala. Faptul ca nu lasati ca servici de informatii sa aiba acces la informatii, trebue sa intre in atentia parlamentului.Cu alte cuvinte SIE nu este lasat sa-si faca datoria.
Este o ultima incercare. In caz contrariu voi trimite spre publicare articolul ,pe doua pagini “Deportarea agentului Volodea” ziarului New York Magazin.

Robert Horvath New York

16Septembrie 2008 Va rog confirmati primirea scrisorii si numarul de inregistrare

1. Anarchists;
2. Aliens advocating or teaching opposition to all organized government;
3. Aliens who are members of or affiliated with the Communist Party or any other totalitarian organization;
4. Aliens, not already covered by the preceding classes, advocating the economic, international, and governmental doctrines of world communism;
5. Aliens advocating the overthrow, by force and violence, of the United States government, or any of its officers;
6. Aliens who write, publish, or distribute materials which are subversive;
7. Aliens who affiliate with persons who write, publish, or distribute subversive literature;
8. Aliens whom the Attorney General believes entered the United States principally or incidentally to engage in activities endangering the welfare, safety, or national security of the United States.

U.S. Supreme Court
Berenyi v. Immigration Director, 385 U.S. 630 (1967)
Berenyi v. Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServicePetitioner, an alien who entered this country from Hungary in 1956, filed apetition for naturalization in 1962. In connection therewith, he denied under oath that he had been a member of the Communist Party, or that he had been connected or associated with the Party, either directly or indirectly. The Attorney General opposed the petition, and at the District Court hearing, produced two witnesses whose testimony indicated that petitioner had been a Party member in Hungary. Petitioner denied Party membership, and presented witnesses who testified to his opposition to Communism. The District Judge found that petitioner became a Party member in 1945, remained so for a number of years, attended Party meetings, and that petitioner had thus testified falsely in connection with his citizenship application. Since §§ 101(f) and 316(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act provide that an applicant who gives such false testimony is not “a person of good moral character” within the meaning of the Act, and is therefore ineligible for naturalization, the court denied petitioner’s citizenship application.

Număr curent

Coperta ultimului număr al revistei

Semnal editorial

Emil Constantinescu - Pacatul originar, sacrificiul fondator

Revolutia din decembrie ’89: Pacatul originar, sacrificiul fondator este prima carte dintr-o serie de sapte volume dedicate ultimelor doua decenii din istoria României. „Nu am pretentia ca sunt detinatorul unui adevar politic, juridic sau istoric incontestabil, si sunt gata sa discut si sa accept orice documente, fapte sau marturii care pot lumina mai bine sau chiar altfel realitatea. Educatia mea stiintifica si religioasa m-a ajutat sa cercetez faptele în mod obiectiv, eliberat de ura sau intoleranta. Recunosc însa o anume încrâncenare în ceea ce am scris venita din durerea unui om care a trait în miezul evenimentelor si se simte lovit de acceptarea cinica a crimelor, abuzurilor, coruptiei si minciunii, sau de indiferenta la fel de cinica cu care sunt înca privite de catre o mare parte a societatii românesti.... Am scris aceste carti de pe pozitia victimelor mintite sau speriate, care nu-si cunosc sau nu-si pot apara drepturile. Le-am scris de pe pozitia milioanelor de români cinstiti care cred în adevar, în dreptate si în demnitate.” Emil Constantinescu (text preluat din Introducerea cartii).

Mircea Malita - Mintea cea socotitoare

de academician Mircea Malita, Editura Academiei Române, 2009
În volumul de eseuri „Mintea cea socotitoare“, aparut la Editura Academiei Române, acad. Mircea Malita formuleaza în crescendo o serie de întrebari grave ale timpului nostru: Daca omul este rational, de ce se fac atâtea greseli în economie
sau în politica?; Daca rationalitatea nu e de ajuns, care ar fi rolul întelepciunii?; Din viitorul imprevizibil putem smulge portiuni, daca nu certe, cel putin probabile?; Ce si cum învatam pregatindu-ne pentru viitorul nostru?; Este în stare omenirea sa îsi vindece crizele?; Ne asteapta oare un dezastru final? s.a. De-a lungul anilor, acad. Mircea Malita a staruit asupra acestor teme în lucrari recunoscute, însa acum o face raportându-se la dinamica realitatii imediate, inspirat de cuvintele lui Dimitrie Cantemir: „socoteala mintii mele, lumina dinlauntrul capului“. Eseurile sunt structurate pe patru parti - „Mintea senina“, „Metaforele mintii“, Mintea învolburata“ si „Privind înainte“. Finalul este de un optimism lucid care tine seama de potentialul de rationalitate si imaginatie al mintii umane si, fireste, de generatiile tinere care îl pot valoriza benefic.

Virginia Mircea - Poezii (vol.1 - Mișeii, vol.2 - Vise, îngeri, amintiri), Editura Cadran Politic Virginia Mircea - Poezii (vol.1 - Mișeii, vol.2 - Vise, îngeri, amintiri), Editura Cadran Politic

Această carte de poezie este seismograful de mare sensi­bilitate care înregistrează cele două întâlniri ale sufletului, deo­potrivă cu URÂTUL care ne schilodește ca ființă, ca neam, dar și cu FRUMU­SEȚEA sufletească nepoluată ce stă ca o fântână cu apă curată pe un câmp plin cu peturi și gunoaie nede­gra­da­bile. Ce poate fi mai dureros decât să surprinzi această fibră distrusă de aluviunile istorice încărcate de lașități, inerții, apatii, compromisuri devenite congenitale ale ro­mâ­nului? Vibrația ver­su­rilor, directețea lor, simplitatea dusă până în marginea cotidianului para­do­xal n-au efect distructiv asupra tonu­sului moral al cititorului, ci produc „neli­niștea cea bună”, cum ar spune Sfin­ții Părinți. Citești în revolta și durerea poetei un mănunchi admirabil de calități: o demnitate neînfrântă, o fizio­logie a verticalității și, mai ales, o inimă creștină, „o inimă din ceruri”, cum ar spune poetul latin. Căci, în aceast㠄inimă din ceruri”, există lacrimi deopotrivă pentru românul umi­lit, distrus până și-n visele lui, dar și pentru copilul din Gaza, cu sufletul și trupul chircite sub șenilele tancurilor unui război ce tinde să devină mai lung decât viața lui, ale unui „război-viață”, lacrimi pentru copilul evreu ce nu a putut fi salvat de la deportarea bestială, lacrimi pentru Tibetul sfâșiat. Și toate acestea fără impostura unui ecumenism sentimental, ci izvorâte din acel suspin curat românesc ce face esența lacrimii creștine. (Dan Puric)

ISLAMUL SI SOARTA LUMII - Fundamentalismul islamic ca ideologie politica

ISLAMUL SI SOARTA LUMII - Fundamentalismul islamic ca ideologie politica de Virginia Mircea "Islamul si soarta lumii - Fundamendamentalismul ca ideologie politca invita la o reflectie mai adanca asupra porceselor lumii contemporane. Judecata critica si independenta a autoarei a produs o lucrare de o veritabila investigatie stiintifica, exact la momentul in care tema tratata deseori fara solutii si perspective ocupa scena din fata a politicii si problemelor mondiale. Cititorii o pot aseza cu satisfactie in bliblioteca lor de referinta. Vor fi mult ajutati in intelegerea evenimentelor care ne sesizeaza in prezent si intr-un viitor in care tema nu se va desprinde de mersul lumii contemporane." (academician Mircea Malita)


Institutul de Proiecte pentru Inovatie si Dezvoltare The National Centre for Sustainable Development