Numerele anterioare

2, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71,
 

Lunile anterioare


 

Autor


 

Preparations for the final confruntation

Arthur SUCIU

Ever since the beginning of his presidential term in office, the key strategy followed by Traian Băsescu was aimed at dividing the political arena, both in terms of relationships between parties, and of interactions between their various factions. The tactic consisted in the polarisation by affinities with the presidential initiatives. By bringing together dissident groups and factions, with PD as a nucleus, Traian Băsescu targeted the establishment of a presidential coalition, able to take over the dominant party position from PSD.

But his calculations failed to take into account that in this polarisation, the scales might be tipped in favour of the President’s opponents, rather than of his supporters. The miscalculation thus led to precisely the opposite of what the President hoped for: all parties, except for PD and PLD, joined forces against Traian Băsescu. The result was that Parliament approved the proposal to impeach the President by a landslide.
At present, the Romanian political life focuses on the referendum on the President’s impeachment, with each of the two poles moving to achieve their stated goals. Traian Băsescu, backed by PD and PLD, launched an appeal to the civil society, requesting its support. In the current social-political context, the message of the political class as a whole is affected by an almost dramatic fall in credibility, which is why the only voice still paid heed to is that of the civil society. Which is precisely why the suspended President resorted to the support of the civil society, which he needs just as much as he needs the organisational support provided by parties. Traian Băsescu has so far benefited from a privileged relationship with the civil society, partly due to his support to Monica Macovei. As for his relationship with political parties, apart from the expected backing by the Democrats, the suspended President also gets a helping hand from Theodor Stolojan’s party. The suspension brought Traian Băsescu closer to his former party, from which he had taken a distance lately. This regrouping benefits both the Head of State, which gets to use the logistic means of the party, and the Democrats, who rely on the strong leader’s image to meet their immediate electoral objective: the EP elections. The disadvantages of this unconditional association will be evident in case of referendum failure. Further, the privileged relationship with Theodor Stolojan and the support given by his party helps outline the image of the “real D.A. Alliance,” although PD and PLD denied having signed any protocol. Moreover, the two parties seem to be competing for capitalising on the positive consequences of a prospective referendum victory. However, cooperation is in the best immediate interest of both Traian Băsescu and the two parties, insofar as it is the only solution to overcome their isolation and mobilise the electorate in view of winning the referendum.
The anti-presidential coalition is made up of the other parliamentary parties —PSD, PC, PNL, UDMR and PRM. The association of these parties, some of which make up conflicting pairs — e.g. UDMR and PRM or PSD and PNL — makes this coalition a rather heterogeneous one. The discrepancies between the ideologies and doctrines of these parties are a destabilising factor, particularly since they only share one short-term objective: to depose Traian Băsescu. In this respect, the current political arena is not very different from the 2004 one, in which parties joined forces against PSD and Ion Iliescu. The difference is that this time around the target is Traian Băsescu. Moreover, recent history has proved that coalitions based on little or no ideological affinity cannot survive unless they set long-term objectives. The newly formed anti-presidential coalition stands no chances of political survival, especially since member parties are competing, each of them seeking to be legitimised as Traian Băsescu’s main opponent.
Polls indicate that Traian Băsescu will be reconfirmed as President, therefore the actual goals of the two referendum campaigns are rather to maximise the impact of the final result, and to mitigate it, respectively. On the one hand, the suspended President and the two parties which back him up want a decisive victory, whose echo will be likely to provide PD and PLD with a considerable advantage in the elections for the European Parliament. With a significant change in the electoral scores indicated by polls rather unlikely, the main objective of the presidential coalition is to mobilise the pro-Băsescu electorate, rather than to persuade new categories of public to vote for him. The main hindrance to Traian Băsescu’s reconfirmation is not the inadequate electoral support, but the people’s lack of interest in the referendum endeavour.
On the other hand, the anti-presidential coalition seeks not so much to remove Traian Băsescu immediately, but rather to downplay his victory. The president’s opponents will claim that his legitimacy is actually low. Further, during the one-month suspension in which PSD has the interim president position, the levers to operate the changes needed in order to reduce Traian Băsescu’s subsequent power are in his enemies’ hands. It may well be that the President’s opponents don’t actually want Băsescu removed further to the referendum; a legitimacy perceived as low and limited room to manoeuvre may be enough to seriously erode him by the next presidential elections.
To conclude, given both sides’ sustained effort to meet their goals, as well as the possible emergence of new elements able to reverse current trends, we can only say that the referendum result remains uncertain, although polls indicate a relatively stable public perception at the moment. Furthermore, developments in the political arena largely depend not so much on the actual referendum figures, but on their generally accepted interpretation, and on the course of action each of the sides will embark upon, both during the campaign and after the referendum.

 

 

by Arthur Suciu

Publicat în : English  de la numărul 47

Comentarii

Nu există nici un comentariu. Fii primul care comentează acest articol!

Număr curent

Coperta ultimului număr al revistei

Semnal editorial

Emil Constantinescu - Pacatul originar, sacrificiul fondator

Revolutia din decembrie ’89: Pacatul originar, sacrificiul fondator este prima carte dintr-o serie de sapte volume dedicate ultimelor doua decenii din istoria României. „Nu am pretentia ca sunt detinatorul unui adevar politic, juridic sau istoric incontestabil, si sunt gata sa discut si sa accept orice documente, fapte sau marturii care pot lumina mai bine sau chiar altfel realitatea. Educatia mea stiintifica si religioasa m-a ajutat sa cercetez faptele în mod obiectiv, eliberat de ura sau intoleranta. Recunosc însa o anume încrâncenare în ceea ce am scris venita din durerea unui om care a trait în miezul evenimentelor si se simte lovit de acceptarea cinica a crimelor, abuzurilor, coruptiei si minciunii, sau de indiferenta la fel de cinica cu care sunt înca privite de catre o mare parte a societatii românesti.... Am scris aceste carti de pe pozitia victimelor mintite sau speriate, care nu-si cunosc sau nu-si pot apara drepturile. Le-am scris de pe pozitia milioanelor de români cinstiti care cred în adevar, în dreptate si în demnitate.” Emil Constantinescu (text preluat din Introducerea cartii).

Mircea Malita - Mintea cea socotitoare

MINTEA CEA SOCOTITOARE
de academician Mircea Malita, Editura Academiei Române, 2009
În volumul de eseuri „Mintea cea socotitoare“, aparut la Editura Academiei Române, acad. Mircea Malita formuleaza în crescendo o serie de întrebari grave ale timpului nostru: Daca omul este rational, de ce se fac atâtea greseli în economie
sau în politica?; Daca rationalitatea nu e de ajuns, care ar fi rolul întelepciunii?; Din viitorul imprevizibil putem smulge portiuni, daca nu certe, cel putin probabile?; Ce si cum învatam pregatindu-ne pentru viitorul nostru?; Este în stare omenirea sa îsi vindece crizele?; Ne asteapta oare un dezastru final? s.a. De-a lungul anilor, acad. Mircea Malita a staruit asupra acestor teme în lucrari recunoscute, însa acum o face raportându-se la dinamica realitatii imediate, inspirat de cuvintele lui Dimitrie Cantemir: „socoteala mintii mele, lumina dinlauntrul capului“. Eseurile sunt structurate pe patru parti - „Mintea senina“, „Metaforele mintii“, Mintea învolburata“ si „Privind înainte“. Finalul este de un optimism lucid care tine seama de potentialul de rationalitate si imaginatie al mintii umane si, fireste, de generatiile tinere care îl pot valoriza benefic.

Virginia Mircea - Poezii (vol.1 - Mișeii, vol.2 - Vise, îngeri, amintiri), Editura Cadran Politic Virginia Mircea - Poezii (vol.1 - Mișeii, vol.2 - Vise, îngeri, amintiri), Editura Cadran Politic

Această carte de poezie este seismograful de mare sensi­bilitate care înregistrează cele două întâlniri ale sufletului, deo­potrivă cu URÂTUL care ne schilodește ca ființă, ca neam, dar și cu FRUMU­SEȚEA sufletească nepoluată ce stă ca o fântână cu apă curată pe un câmp plin cu peturi și gunoaie nede­gra­da­bile. Ce poate fi mai dureros decât să surprinzi această fibră distrusă de aluviunile istorice încărcate de lașități, inerții, apatii, compromisuri devenite congenitale ale ro­mâ­nului? Vibrația ver­su­rilor, directețea lor, simplitatea dusă până în marginea cotidianului para­do­xal n-au efect distructiv asupra tonu­sului moral al cititorului, ci produc „neli­niștea cea bună”, cum ar spune Sfin­ții Părinți. Citești în revolta și durerea poetei un mănunchi admirabil de calități: o demnitate neînfrântă, o fizio­logie a verticalității și, mai ales, o inimă creștină, „o inimă din ceruri”, cum ar spune poetul latin. Căci, în aceast㠄inimă din ceruri”, există lacrimi deopotrivă pentru românul umi­lit, distrus până și-n visele lui, dar și pentru copilul din Gaza, cu sufletul și trupul chircite sub șenilele tancurilor unui război ce tinde să devină mai lung decât viața lui, ale unui „război-viață”, lacrimi pentru copilul evreu ce nu a putut fi salvat de la deportarea bestială, lacrimi pentru Tibetul sfâșiat. Și toate acestea fără impostura unui ecumenism sentimental, ci izvorâte din acel suspin curat românesc ce face esența lacrimii creștine. (Dan Puric)

ISLAMUL SI SOARTA LUMII - Fundamentalismul islamic ca ideologie politica

ISLAMUL SI SOARTA LUMII - Fundamentalismul islamic ca ideologie politica de Virginia Mircea "Islamul si soarta lumii - Fundamendamentalismul ca ideologie politca invita la o reflectie mai adanca asupra porceselor lumii contemporane. Judecata critica si independenta a autoarei a produs o lucrare de o veritabila investigatie stiintifica, exact la momentul in care tema tratata deseori fara solutii si perspective ocupa scena din fata a politicii si problemelor mondiale. Cititorii o pot aseza cu satisfactie in bliblioteca lor de referinta. Vor fi mult ajutati in intelegerea evenimentelor care ne sesizeaza in prezent si intr-un viitor in care tema nu se va desprinde de mersul lumii contemporane." (academician Mircea Malita)

Parteneri

Institutul de Proiecte pentru Inovatie si Dezvoltare The National Centre for Sustainable Development

Login: