Numerele anterioare

2, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71,
 

Lunile anterioare


 

Autor


 

Elections with no choices

Andrei ŢĂRANU

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: ''; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: ''; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">The conclusion of the first ballot for electing the President of Romania and the Parliament was by no means spectacular, just as the campaign itself was not particularly exciting, both on account of the Central Electoral Bureau (BEC), and of the National Broadcasting Monitoring Authority (CNA). And we have had no spectacular outcome not because the final results were not interesting, but because the outcome reflected, to a substantial extent, the voters' increasing lack of interest in the political life. The turnout was mediocre, inertia-driven, with Romanian citizens proving that at least from this point of view they are prepared for a lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: ''; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: ''; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">Europe- lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: ''; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: ''; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"> in which bureaucracy and personal comfort are more important than politicians lacking in strength.

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">The turnover, put at little over 60 per cent of the Romanians entitled to voting, was one of the lowest in the past few years, showcasing both the voters' passive attitude, and the fact that political parties were unable to stimulate the society's interest in politics. And this comes precisely at a time when lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">Romania lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> is facing the most important political, social and economic challenge in its contemporary history, namely integration to the European Union. Although this objective was used by all political parties in the electoral campaign, it was presented as if in an attempt to meet an obligation, rather than as the essential stepping stone in the political communication and propaganda. Without such a purpose, the campaign was turned into a lengthy and boring beating-about-the-bushes, in which neither political parties nor citizens had anything to gain, and very likely media producers got quite bored with as well.

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> style="mso-tab-count: 1">           

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> 

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">Winner of the first ballot

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> 

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> style="mso-tab-count: 1">            This boredom came in quite handy to the ruling party, which probably had arranged the system so as to carry this apathy on and further fuel it, with the obvious purpose of generating the image of that peace that President Ion Iliescu has been invoking ever since the first years of Romanian democracy. Using this as the starting point, the PSD+PUR National Union built the image of a sound Government, which plans to work hard for the citizens, on the basis of a well defined and duly implemented programme, and this strategy was quite successful.

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">PSD' electoral campaign was undoubtedly very well designed, for many reasons, two of which are worth mentioning. First of all, through the alliance with the National Humanist Party (PUR), PSD managed to win over the last national-impact TV station, leaving the difficult task of conveying the Opposition's messages on the shoulders of two or three smaller stations. Thus, for most citizens, in particular for those in rural communities, whose main source of information is the television, opportunities to hear and understand correctly the message of the Opposition were drastically reduced. Which is not to mean that the remaining TV stations did not try to reach the viewers, but their attempts were obviously hindered by the diabolic self-censorship system imposed by BEC and CNA, which did not allow them to exceed their coverage and technical restrictions.

Thus, the PSD+PUR Union achieved an outstanding performance, that of escaping accusations referring to pressure on information media, and at the same time of conveying direct and effective signals to the voters - which the Opposition couldn't always do. Moreover, the fact that face-to-face debates of the party's main image carriers, i.e. the presidential candidates, were hosted by TV stations acknowledged as being subdued to the ruling party, accounted for a ridiculous show format, on the verge of the absurd. The marathon on TVR 1, at least, was utterly abnormal, both in terms of format - meaning the sets of questions - and in terms of diluting the candidates' electoral messages in the huge amount of empty words imposed by producers.

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">Adopting McLuhan's classical theory that the medium creates the message, the ruling party was able to build its campaign on the economic and political achievements of the past few years, not directly, but through the media, and through television in particular. I believe I can safely say that even commercials were indirectly pleading PSD's case, given that a range of Romanians' material myths came true (whisky on shelves, good, cheap cars, the possibility to travel in the West any time, electronics and home appliance purchased on credit just on the basis of the ID card), although they were not very likely to be reached, four years ago. And PSD managed to introduce all this commercial mythology in its portfolio of achievements, through the "economic growth" concept.

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">Obviously, many of these economic achievements would have been accomplished under any free market circumstances, by virtue of an inescapable economic order. But the PSD+PUR Union's advantage was that these changes occurred during the Nastase Government's term in office. And Nastase, thanks to a very good campaign team, was able to turn them into his personal merit. The same campaign designers also changed the Premier's image, turning him from the arrogant character he was perceived as one year ago into a calm and warm guy, different from Ion Iliescu, but human: a man who can stutter with emotion, who suggests he is able to play guitar, live on TV (he isn't), one who likes Wagner, but also Compact rock band.

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">The change was well received, in particular since personal data have had their impact in the campaign, vaguely conducted in line with European practices. A tall, smiling individual, apparently educated (speaking foreign languages), former Minister of Foreign Affairs, will be better received by Europe, voters told themselves, than a former Minister of Transportation, originally a rude sailor going from one blunder to another. And Adrian Năstase benefited in this campaign from the contribution of first-rate international politicians such as Bush, Berlusconi or Tony Blair.

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">For this reason, any one who analysed these data could forecast that the PSD+PUR Union had more chances to win the elections, even by a larger margin. On one condition: to take the civil society out of the equation. Because during this electoral campaign, the civil society was undoubtedly the true opposition to PSD, once again revealing the corrupt and outdated face of the ruling party. A large share of first-rate printed media and civil society were the scaffolding on which D.A. Alliance built its campaign message. But unfortunately it was only used for obtaining the negative vote.

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> 

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">The last will come out first...

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> 

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">Built as a fierce reaction against PSD, the lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">Alliance lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">'s campaign was a mediocre one, given that the Opposition lacked a true opportunity of having a direct dialogue with the Power. Whereas in 2000 the Opposition at that time, the current Power, capitalised on the weakness and financial fear of the media system, in 2004, after learning their lesson in the local elections, the Power no longer allowed for different views in the media institutions it was controlling. Therefore the Opposition's reaction could only be heard via the civil society or through secondary image carriers offered unfavourable airtime in the day (in the morning, when people are at work) or in the night (late at night).

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">Without a coherent programme and a credible Governmental team, the D.A. Alliance relied on its traditional voters, i.e. those who would under no circumstances vote for PSD or similar formulas. And they cast their votes, proving once again that their number is not large enough. Because in exit-poll estimates the lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">Alliance lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> did not get more than the total number of votes the two member parties would have got before becoming allies. In other words, unlike in the local elections, lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">Alliance lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> member parties found no other supporters except for their own electoral pools. Many of those who voted for D.A. Alliance now, apart from the traditional voters, are in fact those who in 2000, out of despair or disgust, voted for the Greater Romania Party (PRM). There can be no others, considering that the young didn't come to polling stations in spectacular numbers, and it was the young that the lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">Alliance lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> expected to bring about the change.

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">For this reason, we might hardly say that the lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">Alliance lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">, as an entity, had an electoral campaign. And this is because it made the mistake of throwing the entire campaign on the main image carrier (the political driving force) - Traian Basescu. Replacing Theodor Stolojan in the middle of the race appeared in a first stage to be a vote-winning move, but it proved to be an error, as most of the public perceived it - quite correctly in a way - as the political lynching of an innocent for the base goal of attracting even more negative votes. The idea that Băsescu is a charismatic character who can actually change things appeared to many as a well targeted blow against PSD, whose enemy Basescu admitted to being. But one fact was overlooked: that Băsescu entered this competition already tired, after a difficult local campaign, and Ciorbea's image did not fade away from the memory of Romanians, and Bucharesters in particular.

lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">Stepping in right in the middle of the campaign, Băsescu did cope with it quite honourably, considering that he used the entire team he had worked with in the local elections, although the two campaigns do not have the same symbolic value, nor the same type of electorate. Moreover, unlike in the local electoral campaign, Băsescu didn't benefit from a direct debate with his main opponent, Adrian Năstase, who would not strain too much before the great confrontation in the runoff.

Publicat în : English  de la numărul 21

Comentarii

Nu există nici un comentariu. Fii primul care comentează acest articol!

Număr curent

Coperta ultimului număr al revistei

Semnal editorial

Emil Constantinescu - Pacatul originar, sacrificiul fondator

Revolutia din decembrie ’89: Pacatul originar, sacrificiul fondator este prima carte dintr-o serie de sapte volume dedicate ultimelor doua decenii din istoria României. „Nu am pretentia ca sunt detinatorul unui adevar politic, juridic sau istoric incontestabil, si sunt gata sa discut si sa accept orice documente, fapte sau marturii care pot lumina mai bine sau chiar altfel realitatea. Educatia mea stiintifica si religioasa m-a ajutat sa cercetez faptele în mod obiectiv, eliberat de ura sau intoleranta. Recunosc însa o anume încrâncenare în ceea ce am scris venita din durerea unui om care a trait în miezul evenimentelor si se simte lovit de acceptarea cinica a crimelor, abuzurilor, coruptiei si minciunii, sau de indiferenta la fel de cinica cu care sunt înca privite de catre o mare parte a societatii românesti.... Am scris aceste carti de pe pozitia victimelor mintite sau speriate, care nu-si cunosc sau nu-si pot apara drepturile. Le-am scris de pe pozitia milioanelor de români cinstiti care cred în adevar, în dreptate si în demnitate.” Emil Constantinescu (text preluat din Introducerea cartii).

Mircea Malita - Mintea cea socotitoare

MINTEA CEA SOCOTITOARE
de academician Mircea Malita, Editura Academiei Române, 2009
În volumul de eseuri „Mintea cea socotitoare“, aparut la Editura Academiei Române, acad. Mircea Malita formuleaza în crescendo o serie de întrebari grave ale timpului nostru: Daca omul este rational, de ce se fac atâtea greseli în economie
sau în politica?; Daca rationalitatea nu e de ajuns, care ar fi rolul întelepciunii?; Din viitorul imprevizibil putem smulge portiuni, daca nu certe, cel putin probabile?; Ce si cum învatam pregatindu-ne pentru viitorul nostru?; Este în stare omenirea sa îsi vindece crizele?; Ne asteapta oare un dezastru final? s.a. De-a lungul anilor, acad. Mircea Malita a staruit asupra acestor teme în lucrari recunoscute, însa acum o face raportându-se la dinamica realitatii imediate, inspirat de cuvintele lui Dimitrie Cantemir: „socoteala mintii mele, lumina dinlauntrul capului“. Eseurile sunt structurate pe patru parti - „Mintea senina“, „Metaforele mintii“, Mintea învolburata“ si „Privind înainte“. Finalul este de un optimism lucid care tine seama de potentialul de rationalitate si imaginatie al mintii umane si, fireste, de generatiile tinere care îl pot valoriza benefic.

Virginia Mircea - Poezii (vol.1 - Mișeii, vol.2 - Vise, îngeri, amintiri), Editura Cadran Politic Virginia Mircea - Poezii (vol.1 - Mișeii, vol.2 - Vise, îngeri, amintiri), Editura Cadran Politic

Această carte de poezie este seismograful de mare sensi­bilitate care înregistrează cele două întâlniri ale sufletului, deo­potrivă cu URÂTUL care ne schilodește ca ființă, ca neam, dar și cu FRUMU­SEȚEA sufletească nepoluată ce stă ca o fântână cu apă curată pe un câmp plin cu peturi și gunoaie nede­gra­da­bile. Ce poate fi mai dureros decât să surprinzi această fibră distrusă de aluviunile istorice încărcate de lașități, inerții, apatii, compromisuri devenite congenitale ale ro­mâ­nului? Vibrația ver­su­rilor, directețea lor, simplitatea dusă până în marginea cotidianului para­do­xal n-au efect distructiv asupra tonu­sului moral al cititorului, ci produc „neli­niștea cea bună”, cum ar spune Sfin­ții Părinți. Citești în revolta și durerea poetei un mănunchi admirabil de calități: o demnitate neînfrântă, o fizio­logie a verticalității și, mai ales, o inimă creștină, „o inimă din ceruri”, cum ar spune poetul latin. Căci, în aceast㠄inimă din ceruri”, există lacrimi deopotrivă pentru românul umi­lit, distrus până și-n visele lui, dar și pentru copilul din Gaza, cu sufletul și trupul chircite sub șenilele tancurilor unui război ce tinde să devină mai lung decât viața lui, ale unui „război-viață”, lacrimi pentru copilul evreu ce nu a putut fi salvat de la deportarea bestială, lacrimi pentru Tibetul sfâșiat. Și toate acestea fără impostura unui ecumenism sentimental, ci izvorâte din acel suspin curat românesc ce face esența lacrimii creștine. (Dan Puric)

ISLAMUL SI SOARTA LUMII - Fundamentalismul islamic ca ideologie politica

ISLAMUL SI SOARTA LUMII - Fundamentalismul islamic ca ideologie politica de Virginia Mircea "Islamul si soarta lumii - Fundamendamentalismul ca ideologie politca invita la o reflectie mai adanca asupra porceselor lumii contemporane. Judecata critica si independenta a autoarei a produs o lucrare de o veritabila investigatie stiintifica, exact la momentul in care tema tratata deseori fara solutii si perspective ocupa scena din fata a politicii si problemelor mondiale. Cititorii o pot aseza cu satisfactie in bliblioteca lor de referinta. Vor fi mult ajutati in intelegerea evenimentelor care ne sesizeaza in prezent si intr-un viitor in care tema nu se va desprinde de mersul lumii contemporane." (academician Mircea Malita)

Parteneri

Institutul de Proiecte pentru Inovatie si Dezvoltare The National Centre for Sustainable Development

Login: