Numerele anterioare

2, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71,

Lunile anterioare




Choosing from two evils

Virginia MIRCEA

Once every four years, we are invited to take part, as helpless spectators, and then as apparent decision-makers, in the political ritual of the electoral campaign, in the elections game.

Although the law stipulates a certain period of time for the electoral campaign, the entire year 2004 appears to be under the sign of this autumn's elections, as voters find themselves in the awkward position of the spectators to a tennis game (rather mediocre, we should say), whose necks are stiffened after continuously turning right to left and back, to watch a game that started six-seven months ago. The consequence? An electorate increasingly resembling Caragiale's symbolic Intoxicated Citizen, wondering "And whom should I vote for?" - at least this is what polls seem to indicate, the error margin of which is upset by the high number of the undecided.
Nonetheless, it is not only the poor quality of the recently concluded electoral campaign which is to blame for the high number of the undecided, but also the performance of the main political players over the 15 years that have elapsed since the change in December 1989. Romanians' reasons for dissatisfaction are mainly related to the wide gap between expectations and actual living standards. Although social indices point to a rise in living standards compared to the early post-1989 period, Romanians' expectations have also gone up, which is why economic performances have to be utterly spectacular compared to the current situation, in order for the public institutions and implicitly the political class to enjoy a favourable image.  Another reason of disappointment comes from the perpetuation of the same characters in the political arena, from the fact that no changes have occurred at the top of the political class. Faces remain the same, regardless of the mutations in the public space. And new comers in the political arena appear to be mere copies of the old politicians that seem to have seized everlasting monopoly over the public space.
This year some change is nevertheless noticed at the top level of domestic politics, in the sense of mutations operated in the political community. Parties the line of which belonged rather in the past century, namely the Greater Romania Party (PRM) and PUNR, but also the Democrat Union of Hungarians in Romania (UDMR), appear to lessen their role and influence. The evolution of such parties was long seen by political analysts as directly linked, in the sense that the former jointly account for only an artificial counterbalance to the latter. Whereas a shrinking support to PRM might indicate the Romanian electorate is recovering to democracy, the case of UDMR must be assessed against other elements, such as the emergence of radical groups of Hungarians in Romania, the rhetoric of which led to UDMR's losing part of the Hungarian minority's support.  On the one hand, UDMR has achieved many of its initial objectives, while on the other hand party officials are accused of having bargained with the Romanian ones to achieve their personal purposes rather than the group's.
Separately, Christian-Democracy, which has never been one of the major options of the Romanian voters (the success of the National Christian-Democrat Peasants Party - PNTCD - can be better accounted for by the excessive focus on individuals in the Romanian politics and by the fact that, at one moment in its history, this party managed to bring together individuals emblematic for the right-wing Romanians), is undergoing a significant crisis, as recent reorganisation attempts are irrelevant for the nearing elections.  Moreover, PNTCD was the main loser in the 1996-2000 mandate, which put it out of the political stage in the next mandate and is very likely to prevent it from entering the Parliament this autumn as well.
The main players in this autumn's political game therefore are the Social-Democrat Party (PSD), the National Liberal Party (PNL) and the Democrat Party (PD), the latter competing jointly under the "Justice and Truth Alliance" umbrella. Probably this almost bipolar aspect is the best explanation for the Romanian voters' disappointment. And not because options are very limited, but rather because a brief analysis of the recent history of the two parties' officials reveals that, at one time or another, all the current leaders have been in power. They have all been part of a political cooperative, be it FSN (for the Democrats and PSD, but also for some of the Liberals participating in the Stolojan governance) or CDR (for the Democrats and the Liberals). And, unfortunately for all of them, Romanians remember more than the main runners in this autumn's race would like them to.   Although the Liberals and Democrats managed to avoid assuming responsibility for the 1996-2000 mandate, not few are the voters who remember that incumbent Opposition leaders were holding key positions in the respective administration and shouldered some of the economic disaster this governance brought. Also, PSD's desperate efforts to change its image of corrupt, Mafia ring party cannot make up for the its having played host, for a long time, to individuals of dubious morals and history, from Corneliu Iacubov to Sechelariu or Mischie.
And, were we to add to all of the above a record of large scale illegal deals in which names of power and opposition parties are equally involved (Megapower, Rompetrol, Sidex etc), and the fact that for most political leaders ideology is a mere label on the packaging, Romanians' lack of interest in the political game is not only explicable, but quite the natural thing to do. In the end, we have to choose between two evils. And this is precisely why, in this autumn's elections, it is essential for us to make a sensible, rather than an emotional choice.  We must play the role of decision-makers in the political game, and not allow ourselves to be puppets manipulated by campaign advisers' populist messages. And probably it is more important than ever for us to ignore the already too aggressive campaign and vote for those concrete projects which benefit each of us.
Publicat în : English  de la numărul 18


Nu există nici un comentariu. Fii primul care comentează acest articol!

Număr curent

Coperta ultimului număr al revistei

Semnal editorial

Emil Constantinescu - Pacatul originar, sacrificiul fondator

Revolutia din decembrie ’89: Pacatul originar, sacrificiul fondator este prima carte dintr-o serie de sapte volume dedicate ultimelor doua decenii din istoria României. „Nu am pretentia ca sunt detinatorul unui adevar politic, juridic sau istoric incontestabil, si sunt gata sa discut si sa accept orice documente, fapte sau marturii care pot lumina mai bine sau chiar altfel realitatea. Educatia mea stiintifica si religioasa m-a ajutat sa cercetez faptele în mod obiectiv, eliberat de ura sau intoleranta. Recunosc însa o anume încrâncenare în ceea ce am scris venita din durerea unui om care a trait în miezul evenimentelor si se simte lovit de acceptarea cinica a crimelor, abuzurilor, coruptiei si minciunii, sau de indiferenta la fel de cinica cu care sunt înca privite de catre o mare parte a societatii românesti.... Am scris aceste carti de pe pozitia victimelor mintite sau speriate, care nu-si cunosc sau nu-si pot apara drepturile. Le-am scris de pe pozitia milioanelor de români cinstiti care cred în adevar, în dreptate si în demnitate.” Emil Constantinescu (text preluat din Introducerea cartii).

Mircea Malita - Mintea cea socotitoare

de academician Mircea Malita, Editura Academiei Române, 2009
În volumul de eseuri „Mintea cea socotitoare“, aparut la Editura Academiei Române, acad. Mircea Malita formuleaza în crescendo o serie de întrebari grave ale timpului nostru: Daca omul este rational, de ce se fac atâtea greseli în economie
sau în politica?; Daca rationalitatea nu e de ajuns, care ar fi rolul întelepciunii?; Din viitorul imprevizibil putem smulge portiuni, daca nu certe, cel putin probabile?; Ce si cum învatam pregatindu-ne pentru viitorul nostru?; Este în stare omenirea sa îsi vindece crizele?; Ne asteapta oare un dezastru final? s.a. De-a lungul anilor, acad. Mircea Malita a staruit asupra acestor teme în lucrari recunoscute, însa acum o face raportându-se la dinamica realitatii imediate, inspirat de cuvintele lui Dimitrie Cantemir: „socoteala mintii mele, lumina dinlauntrul capului“. Eseurile sunt structurate pe patru parti - „Mintea senina“, „Metaforele mintii“, Mintea învolburata“ si „Privind înainte“. Finalul este de un optimism lucid care tine seama de potentialul de rationalitate si imaginatie al mintii umane si, fireste, de generatiile tinere care îl pot valoriza benefic.

Virginia Mircea - Poezii (vol.1 - Mișeii, vol.2 - Vise, îngeri, amintiri), Editura Cadran Politic Virginia Mircea - Poezii (vol.1 - Mișeii, vol.2 - Vise, îngeri, amintiri), Editura Cadran Politic

Această carte de poezie este seismograful de mare sensi­bilitate care înregistrează cele două întâlniri ale sufletului, deo­potrivă cu URÂTUL care ne schilodește ca ființă, ca neam, dar și cu FRUMU­SEȚEA sufletească nepoluată ce stă ca o fântână cu apă curată pe un câmp plin cu peturi și gunoaie nede­gra­da­bile. Ce poate fi mai dureros decât să surprinzi această fibră distrusă de aluviunile istorice încărcate de lașități, inerții, apatii, compromisuri devenite congenitale ale ro­mâ­nului? Vibrația ver­su­rilor, directețea lor, simplitatea dusă până în marginea cotidianului para­do­xal n-au efect distructiv asupra tonu­sului moral al cititorului, ci produc „neli­niștea cea bună”, cum ar spune Sfin­ții Părinți. Citești în revolta și durerea poetei un mănunchi admirabil de calități: o demnitate neînfrântă, o fizio­logie a verticalității și, mai ales, o inimă creștină, „o inimă din ceruri”, cum ar spune poetul latin. Căci, în aceast㠄inimă din ceruri”, există lacrimi deopotrivă pentru românul umi­lit, distrus până și-n visele lui, dar și pentru copilul din Gaza, cu sufletul și trupul chircite sub șenilele tancurilor unui război ce tinde să devină mai lung decât viața lui, ale unui „război-viață”, lacrimi pentru copilul evreu ce nu a putut fi salvat de la deportarea bestială, lacrimi pentru Tibetul sfâșiat. Și toate acestea fără impostura unui ecumenism sentimental, ci izvorâte din acel suspin curat românesc ce face esența lacrimii creștine. (Dan Puric)

ISLAMUL SI SOARTA LUMII - Fundamentalismul islamic ca ideologie politica

ISLAMUL SI SOARTA LUMII - Fundamentalismul islamic ca ideologie politica de Virginia Mircea "Islamul si soarta lumii - Fundamendamentalismul ca ideologie politca invita la o reflectie mai adanca asupra porceselor lumii contemporane. Judecata critica si independenta a autoarei a produs o lucrare de o veritabila investigatie stiintifica, exact la momentul in care tema tratata deseori fara solutii si perspective ocupa scena din fata a politicii si problemelor mondiale. Cititorii o pot aseza cu satisfactie in bliblioteca lor de referinta. Vor fi mult ajutati in intelegerea evenimentelor care ne sesizeaza in prezent si intr-un viitor in care tema nu se va desprinde de mersul lumii contemporane." (academician Mircea Malita)


Institutul de Proiecte pentru Inovatie si Dezvoltare The National Centre for Sustainable Development